Monday, December 8, 2014

Junk Food for the Soul



When I was very young my mother
would take me shopping. Stores were
wonderful, appealing places, filled with
brightly-labeled boxes and cans. It was
always fun to see what was there,
especially when Mom would allow me to
choose the food we were going to eat.
There was something to appeal to every
appetite. Invariably I would get fixated on
food items that weren't very healthy for
me or for the family. Given the choice, I
would fill the cart with sugary, addictive
things that provided a quick fill and little nutritive value.

There's no doubt that Mom knew how important it was for kids to make choices, but fortunately she was there to provide some guidance as well. It was nice for everyone to have the occasional treat, but more important for me to choose food that would make the whole family healthier. The manufacturers of the addictive foods thought our health was not as important as keeping me coming back for more.

I hope there's something in this story that rings true to everyone. Someone once said that "you can never get enough of what you don't need." It seems fair to apply that concept to voters. Some of our American brothers and sisters keep choosing the equivalent of political junk food. The manufacturers have kept it flowing for decades and they've found their target consumers. They offer sweets, fats, and frosting that addict but never satisfy.

As you eat political junk food you become weaker and unattractive, you lose self-confidence, and you become desperate to identify with other victims. Worse yet, you care less about the well-being of anyone but yourself. The junk food purveyors feel your discontent and that of everyone in your group. They'll tell you it's not your fault, it's those people who make you feel envious. Those few skinny, healthy, happy, naïve people.

Envy is a soul-crushing, ugly poison. It's never led me anywhere but down. Likewise, getting even will never make you happy. Anyone who uses envy to motivate your vote doesn't care about you, your well-being, or the happiness of your family. They want you addicted for.ev.er. So if you're part of a disadvantaged group, please, please do some shopping. Don't go back to the same snack bar where they claim to feel your pain.

You are an individual. Browse, search, and shop for what makes you and everyone else more healthy, independent, and capable. And lay off the junk food.

Monday, November 17, 2014

Why anyone can rise to their full potential

   Can anyone rise to their full potential? Many of us would think not. And they have compelling evidence. Some of us are born into a poverty-stricken or abusive home; others have to deal with a poor-quality education and are less able to succeed in school. Many of us have health problems; others are born into countries in this world where one's right to choose their own destiny is not respected nor recognized. A lot of us accept this as justification to prove that some people just 'aren't lucky' or are disadvantaged. Such reasoning is false. Though many of us are disadvantaged in certain areas, each and every one of us can still rise to our full potential. In this essay, I hope to explain why this is so and reveal why this issue is more tied into our current issues and future well-being than we might think.

   In order to illustrate my point (and show how this is connected to present-day political topics), let's take a look at the issue revolving around the wealthy vs. the needy. Some of us believe that success requires wealth and affluence. For example, if someone is born into an impoverished family with abusive parents, one would expect that person's life to progress like this: they go to school, get bad grades, get bullied, bully others, don't go to college, don't get a job, and end up homeless, living in the forest and possibly asking for government assistance. Because of this, one would describe this person as 'unlucky'. Is this fair? Some historical figures that many of us consider heroes, in fact, came from a simple background.

   Consider Abraham Lincoln, who was born out in a log cabin in Kentucky (which was the frontier at the time) into a simple, hard-working family. He was not rich or wealthy by any means. His actual education, in total, summed up to less than a year. Yet, he rose beyond his circumstances. Lincoln largely taught himself by reading from books. He worked hard around the home. And because of his initiative, he embarked on a life journey that took him out of the backwoods of Kentucky, into Illinois, and eventually, to the White House at a time when the country was on the verge of falling apart. Abraham Lincoln started as a farmer, but ultimately became a soldier (in the Black Hawk War, though he saw no actual fighting), a lawyer, a congressman, and finally, president of the United States. Abraham Lincoln led the nation through its largest test of unity and sacrifice, and it was because of him that the Union remained united and the slaves were freed. There were countless others like him, people who were born in log cabins with very little. Many of these people stayed where they were at; some probably died in the same cabin in which they were born. Lincoln was different. He ended with much more than he started with, and it was largely because of his ingenuity that the United States remains a united nation today, where we can experience the same blessings of freedom, self-determination and potential opportunity that enabled him to become a great man and leader.

   Who could have guessed that Ben Carson, born in a very "disadvantaged" background in which he did poorly in school and did not know how to read, would rise to become a great neurosurgeon and potential 2016 presidential candidate? Yet, it still happened. Ben Carson's mother, determined to give her children better opportunities in life, forced them to turn off the TV and learn to read. Soon, Ben Carson learned to love reading. He shot ahead in school, rising to become a great student. Today, he is a well-known neurosurgeon and has recently been a subject of great presidential speculation.

   Besides Abraham Lincoln and Ben Carson, there are millions of Americans who started off with simple means and rose to become something more. This is the reality of the American Dream; anyone, no matter what background they came from, has the potential to succeed. True, not all of us start out with the best of conditions, but ultimately, those of us who work harder to succeed will receive a greater moral boost in self-confidence and determination. After all, if a farmer from Kentucky or a boy from Detroit can rise to become president of the United States or a record-breaking neurosurgeon, surely those same people can achieve anything else they set out to do in life. This system of belief is stronger when we work more diligently; thus, while some of us need to work harder than others to get to a higher spot, those of us who work harder will ultimately be able to do more and more.

   These ideas form the basis of the American Dream. It is the reality of freedom and the right to the pursuit of happiness that has transformed the lives of millions of Americans in the past and here in the present. It is also the ingredient to the reaction that took America from being a handful of rebellious, rival colonies to the world's greatest economic, technological and military superpower. Furthermore, the nations of Europe, along with many nations throughout the world, have had the opportunity to accept the ideas of the American Dream along with the spread of freedom. This is how Japan and Germany rose from being tyranny-stricken, war-devastated and fallen empires to becoming economic giants within a matter of decades. Because of the embracement of the American Dream by many countries, billions of people now enjoy comforts and blessings that their great-grandparents never would have dreamt possible.

   Sadly, the widespread belief among many of us that the disadvantaged "cannot succeed" and the worship of the concept of luck is what condemns many people to failure. These people believe that, because of their background, they cannot possibly become who they want to be. Because of this, they simply give up, lay back and expect some "better-off guy" to come take care of them. And some people who are affluent take advantage of this. They prey on the false beliefs and oftentimes self-imposed failures of these individuals by catering to their "needs". By doing so, the "unlucky" become dependent on these "lucky" people, who in reality are preventing them from succeeding. Thus, we have programs such as government welfare that don't make the disadvantaged any better-off or able to rise beyond their current state. This has an unfortunate effect that keeps many of us at home and abroad trapped where we start. In many cases, this is why "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer."

   It is important for people to recognize that they have the ability to rise to their full potential. This is the same way that Abraham Lincoln, Ben Carson and countless others have become great leaders and inspirational examples. For all we know, there may be a Lincoln, or a Ben Carson, or a George Washington, Winston Churchill or Ronald Reagan among us somewhere. They could be rich or poor. They could be White, Hispanic, African-American, or Asian-American. They could have a disability. They could be Christian, Jewish, Muslim or Atheist. Yet, no matter what their background may be, their potential still exists, and the key to saving our future might rest in the hands of these individuals, just as it has with people in the past.

Bibliography:

Thursday, October 23, 2014

"Don't Give up the Truth!" - How the War of 1812 really happened

USS Constitution vs HMS Guerriere by Michel Felice Corne
   The War of 1812, as many other figures have stated, is one of the most ignored, forgotten or distorted major events in American history. Most Americans know that Washington D.C. was burned and that the war took place in 1812. And that's pretty much it. Yet, the War of 1812, though relatively small in scale and not an outright military victory for the United States or the United Kingdom, goes far beyond that. How many people know that American forces invaded Canada multiple times, and once burned Toronto (then called York), part of the reason that the British torched the White House? How many of us know anything about the naval combat during the war, such as the stories regarding the USS Constitution, the Battle of Lake Erie, the Battle of Lake Champlain, or James Lawrence's defeat by HMS Shannon ("Don't give up the Ship!")? The War of 1812 did not create a Canadian national anthem, yet the war is better known and more revered by Canadians than Americans. The War of 1812 is one of the most important conflicts we've ever waged (for Americans, and for Canadians I suppose), and few in the United States seem to know anything more than basic details about it!

   Go ask one of your friends about the War of 1812, and there's a good chance that they either won't know anything about it (except that it happened in 1812) or have made up their own version of events. Go to any website or source on the war, and it will likely either say that the British won, or the Americans won.

   In reality, neither side won! And neither side lost. Neither side really accomplished their original goals, and the Americans did not surrender land to Britain, nor vice versa. In order to make this judgement, let us first cover the history of the War of 1812. I will do my best to represent both sides of the conflict fairly.

   What caused the war?

   In the early 19th century, the United Kingdom was at war with Napoleonic France. This almost constant state of war would not end until 1815. During this period, both countries tried to weaken each other economically. Napoleon's Continental System led to France and much of Napoleonic-controlled continental Europe refusing to trade with Britain; as a result, France seized American merchant ships that had been trading with Britain. The British tried to stop neutral countries from trading with France, and thus seized neutral ships as well, including American merchant vessels.

   At first the United States tried using trade restrictions and embargoes to solve the problem regarding British and French maritime attacks; these efforts ultimately failed. Later, the US Government tried to play Britain and France off against each other in competition for American trade, saying that if one side ended restrictions on trade, then the US would refuse to trade with the other side. This, too, failed. On top of these issues, the British, needing more manpower at sea, impressed American sailors, forcing them into the Royal Navy. Meanwhile, British agents stirred up trouble between American settlers and native tribes in the "Old Northwest" (now present-day Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and Michigan), largely in order to halt American westward expansion and to create a native american buffer state for the protection of British Canada. Eventually, these combined tensions would set off the war; Congress declared war on Britain on June 18, 1812.

   Neither country was prepared for war. The US Army and Navy were both very small, and the government was not ready or in a good position to command a war effort. On the other hand, the British were concentrated on their ongoing fight against Napoleon, which was much larger in scale and closer to home (for the British, not the Canadian colonists) than the War of 1812 would ever be.

   1812

  The fighting on land soon began. The British captured the American fort on Mackinac Island (in Michigan), as the defenders had not received notice of the war. American General William Hull invaded Canada from Michigan, yet he was cautious and easily intimidated by the smaller British force moving towards him under General Isaac Brock. He retreated to Detroit and ended up surrendering the city and his army to the British without a fight (even though the British were outnumbered). Further west, Fort Dearborn (now Chicago) was captured by the Potawatomi. Large parts of the northwest had fallen under British and/or Native American control, and it appeared as though the first year of the war on land went poorly for the United States. American attacks further east against Canada also failed, and British general Isaac Brock gave his life while repelling an American invasion at the Battle of Queenston Heights.

   At sea, things went better for the United States. Though the British would tighten their blockade throughout the war, the Americans won several morale-boosting ship-to-ship victories, notably with the USS Constitution vs. HMS Guerriere and USS United States vs. HMS Macedonian duels. American commanders Isaac Hull and Stephen Decatur became national heroes.

   1813

   In 1813, both sides had mixed success. In the west, the British and their native allies assaulted Fort Meigs, and were repulsed, though many Americans were killed in the River Raisin Massacre. Henry Procter, the new British regional commander, tried to attack small Fort Stephenson on the Sandusky River in Ohio. William Henry Harrison, the American regional commander and future president (for one month) ordered the fort's commander, George Croghan, to abandon the fort. He refused, and with just 160 defenders managed to repel a British/Native American force nearly 10 times larger, thereby saving the American supply depots on the river and making Croghan a hero.

   On the Niagara front, American forces under Winfield Scott launched an amphibious assault against Fort George, capturing it. When the Americans planned to move deeper into the Niagara Peninsula, Laura Secord, a local resident who had been born in Massachusetts, walked 20 miles to warn the British defenders. This enabled the British and their Native American allies to stop the American force at the Battle of Beaver Dams. Further east, an American fleet under Commodore Isaac Chauncey crossed Lake Ontario and landed a force of US troops commanded by explorer and General Zebulon Pike at Toronto, then York, the capital of Upper Canada. The British defenders were outnumbered and in the ensuing battle, the city was captured; however, a magazine exploded, killing Pike. American troops sacked and plundered the city, which in part led to the actions of the British in Washington D.C. the following year. A British attack on Sacket's Harbor (in New York) was repulsed, yet an American advance on Montreal later in the year was beaten back as well.

   Late in 1813, the British made significant advances, occupying Fort Niagara and attacking Buffalo and Black Rock, New York. Perhaps the most notable American victory along the US-Canada border that year was when an American fleet on Lake Erie under Oliver Hazard Perry defeated its British counterpart under Robert Barclay, thus securing control of the lake for the United States and allowing General William Henry Harrison to re-occupy Detroit and enter Ontario, where he defeated General Procter and Tecumseh at the Battle of the Thames. This left part of Ontario in American hands for the rest of the war; Tecumseh's death in the battle broke the power of his pro-British native american confederacy.

   In the meantime, American commander Isaac Chauncey and British commander James Yeo failed to fight a decisive battle for control of Lake Ontario. The British, having been embarrassed by several naval defeats, tightened their blockade of the eastern seaboard, grouped their ships together, and took measures to prevent their frigates from going one-on-one against the biggest American frigates (USS Constitution, USS United States and USS President). The British won a victory when the HMS Shannon under Philip Broke captured the USS Chesapeake, which was commanded by James Lawrence, near Boston. The USS Essex, under the command of David Porter, sailed into the Pacific and attacked Britain's whaling fleet, causing considerable damage until being defeated by the British in the Battle of Valparaiso (1814).

   During the spring and summer of 1813, the British under Rear Admiral George Cockburn raided the Chesapeake Bay region, hitting small towns and fighting with local militia. Beaten at the Battle of Craney Island, the British did some more raiding before withdrawing, in part due to the summer heat. They would be back the following year.

   1814

    In 1814, the war was still largely stalemated, with neither side gaining the upper hand. However, Napoleon's defeat in Europe freed up British forces to be redeployed to North America. In the summer of 1814, the British would launch a multi-pronged invasion of the United States, with the hope of overwhelming the young nation. A British force struck Maine (then part of Massachussets); meeting only weak resistance, they had no trouble occupying the northern parts of the state.

   This was but a small part of Britain's grand offensive, as a force under General Robert Ross and Rear Admiral George Cockburn landed in the Chesapeake. Advancing on a poorly-defended Washington D.C., the veteran British defeated a larger American force of mostly militia at the Battle of Bladensburg. This enabled them to enter the nation's capital, where they torched the White House and Capitol Building, among others. Pushed out by a storm, the British marched on to Baltimore. A smaller American force delayed the British attack at the Battle of North Point (General Ross was killed here), while a British fleet bombarded Fort McHenry. To the joy of the Americans and to the dismay of the British, the fort didn't fall, and the sight of the raised American flag inspired a captive Francis Scott Key to write "The Star-Spangled Banner", the American national anthem. The British withdrew from the region, never to return.

   Up north, the British invaded New York, with a force better than 10,000 troops. But on Lake Champlain, an American squadron under Thomas Macdonough overcame their British counterpart, led by George Downey. This forced the Britsh invasion force to retreat back to Canada.

   Until this event, the British had demanded substantial American cessions in exchange for peace, including a creation of a Native American buffer state, territorial gains for Canada and an American surrender of the Louisiana territory. However, the latest American victories, combined with British losses at Fort Erie in Canada and Fort Bowyer in the South, along with heavy economic losses for both sides, convinced the British to withdraw most of their demands in the peace negotiations at Ghent, in present-day Belgium. The resulting Treaty of Ghent was signed in December of 1814. Captured territories were returned to their rightful owners, and the war would end when both countries ratified the treaty. Yet, at that time, communication took much longer; therefore, the combat would continue into 1815.

   Final Battles

   Another British invasion, aimed at New Orleans, had been meant to give Britain an advantage in the peace negotiations. Neither the Americans nor the British in the region had gotten word that the war was over, therefore the British attack commenced as planned. However, General Andrew Jackson "Old Hickory", who had defeated the native Creek allies of the British, was waiting. In the January 1815 Battle of New Orleans, General Jackson's outnumbered and heterogeneously-mixed force crushed the redcoats, inflicting heavy casualties and a devastating defeat on the British and solidifying American control of the region.

   At sea, the USS President, under Stephen Decatur, attempted to break through the blockade. The plan failed, and Decatur was forced to surrender the ship to a British squadron. Finally, in the Indian Ocean, the British Nautilus was captured by USS Peacock.

   Analysis

   By no means have I mentioned all the battles of the War of 1812, on land or at sea. There are many more stories of heroism, courage and suspense from characters on both sides. However, this summary should be enough for us to judge the results.

   It appears as though both sides gained several different points of leverage over the other. For example, on land, the British held parts of Maine and the Old Northwest (such as Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin), yet the Americans held parts of Canada (for example, in southern Ontario) and controlled Lake Erie. The British imposed a blockade on the eastern seaboard which choked the US economy, yet, American raids and privateer attacks, such as those of USS Essex and USS Argus, inflicted heavy damage on British shipping.

   Though the Americans won some of the battles in Canadian territory, they never managed to capture any important cities such as Montreal or Kingston. On the other hand, the British never took any important American cities of the time, such as New Orleans or Baltimore. These facts present the truth: the war was a stalemate. Neither side won, and neither side lost. Both sides had great victories and suffered crushing defeats. Neither side got exactly what they wanted out of the war. Britain kept control of Canada, and America preserved its independence.

   It's sad and regrettable that so many Americans have forgotten about the importance of this war in the foundation of our country. The impact of the War of 1812 ranks up there with the Revolution and the Civil War because it was America's first big test as a nation. Several important questions were asked. Could the states of the United States, not yet fully united, work together? Was the United States strong enough to preserve its independence and repel a foreign invasion? Would the United States be able to muster heroes of courage and determination when they were needed? To sum it all up, could the United States press onward as a nation, with its independence intact, even when challenged by a powerful nation such as the British Empire?

   Imagine for a second that the United States did lose the War of 1812. What if the British had captured Baltimore? What if the British won the Battle of Lake Champlain, marched down through New York, and cut the country to pieces? Even if the United States had remained independent, it would have been forced to accept Britain's terms. The United States might've lost northern New York and Maine, perhaps even the vast territories of the Louisiana Purchase. The pro-British and federalist New England, far from being disgraced, would have been, politically, on the winning side. It would be the United States, the Democratic-Republican Party, and James Madison who would have been ashamed.

   The United States may have fragmented, with New England seceding to start its own country or perhaps even rejoin the British Empire. This would be seen as proof that the United States was a failure. With state sovereignty still a popular idea at the time, it is possible that the union would have dissolved into independent states. Without being united, America would have become an impoverished nation, dominated by rivalry, despotism and war. One of the founding fathers' greatest fears may have come to pass.

   On the other hand, a defeat for the United States in the War of 1812 might have had the same effect that defeat in World War I had on Germany. Defeated, Americans may have been easy converts for some demagogue who would have promised revenge and glory. Perhaps this demagogue would have taken over the government, destroyed our democratic institutions, and transformed the nation into a militant police state. The United States would not have become a land of opportunity, a place for which millions were willing to risk everything to come and start their lives anew. America's abundant resources might have been used instead to build up a powerful military. This demagogue-leader could've then launched a new war with the United Kingdom, a war for revenge and retribution, a war which might have brought devastation and tragedy to everyone involved.

   In conclusion, the War of 1812 was immensely important in creating an American identity. The fact that our national anthem comes from it is only a small part. Rather than accomplishing any of the goals that our leaders at the time sought to (for example, we failed to conquer Canada), the United States preserved its freedom, gained international respect, and was able to expand in its own right. Had the War of 1812 gone differently, our country would not be the same. Therefore, it would be a sincere sign of gratitude if more Americans would take the time to know at least the basic facts about this forgotten war.

Bibliography: